Compare answers

Use the same bounded context for every reviewer:

Ask Codex and Claude to review this API design. Show their raw answers side by side, without synthesis.

Use providers your host can consult; Claude is unavailable inside Claude Code. The ask-llm-compare workflow returns verbatim answers with attribution. Claude Code retains /compare; Pi uses /skill:ask-llm-compare. Tool-only hosts can ask their assistant to call multi-llm with the selected providers.

multi-llm dispatches the same prompt in parallel. A provider failing or hitting quota does not fail the others.

One provider failure does not erase the others' answers. Keep failures visible and attribute surviving insights only to providers that answered. Compare evidence and disagreements, not vote counts: agreement between models is not proof of correctness.

For a report that checks findings against the code, use Review changes. For research and synthesis, use Brainstorm.